Skip to content
  • PRO
  • Events
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
      • Influencers
      • Lexology European Awards 2026
      • Client Choice Dinner 2026
  • Lexology Compete
  • About
  • Help centre
  • Blog
  • Lexology Academic
  • Lexology Talent Management
  • Login
  • Register
  • PRO
Lexology Article
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • WhatsApp
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Find out more about Lexology or get in touch by visiting our About page.

Register

Tips for Success: Resolving Your Provider/Payor Healthcare Dispute

JAMS

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

USA March 24 2017

texaslawyer.com Friday, March 24, 2017

Tips for Success: Resolving Your Provider/Payor Healthcare Dispute

By Adrienne Publicover

The fate of the Affordable Care Act may be the most significant healthcare issue facing our country. Regardless of the outcome, it is clear that the industry is undergoing dynamic growth and change. With that change comes litigation in all shapes and sizes patient claims against hospitals and nursing homes; conflicts between physicians and/or healthcare professionals and the hospitals in which they work; and financial disputes between payors and providers.

Claims between payors and providers have resulted in significant amounts of civil litigation and arbitration proceedings, both of which can be costly for all parties. However, with careful planning and communication, early mediation can lead to successful and more economically efficient resolution.

Here are a few tips for consideration.

1. Have you identified all

the issues and the necessary

parties? Benjamin Franklin (and sub-

sequently Winston Churchill)

said, "If you fail to plan, you are planning to fail!" As with any mediation, advance collaboration between the parties and the mediator is a crucial element

to success. But with payor- The purpose of such laws is to

provider disputes, this is par- help ensure that medical ser-

ticularly true.

vice providers are fully com-

First, these disputes generally pensated for their work within

involve multiple issues - both specific timeframes. However,

contractual and legal - as well the prompt pay statutes do not

as numerous claims. Identi- apply in every situation.

fying all the issues helps the For example, the Texas Prompt

skilled mediator craft a plan for Pay Act applies only to HMO's

resolution.

and PPO's. It may not apply to

Moreover, these disputes self-funded ERISA plans, fed-

may involve multiple parties. eral employee plans and a few

It is important that all entities others.

responsible for paying money Moreover, the Act only

(or entitled to receive money) applies to "clean claims." Data

are brought into the process in contained in the claim must be

a timely manner so that global complete, legible and accurate.

resolution may be achieved. The claim generally must have

These may include parent cor- been submitted within 95 days

porations and subsidiaries, as of services rendered.

well as additional providers.

Late payment of these claims

may result in substantial mone-

2. What is the amount at tary penalties to the point where

stake?

settlement may be impacted.

It has been said before, but it Thus, it is important to ensure

bears repeating: mediation is that applicability of the laws

not the time for high level math. has properly been evaluated.

Issues such as pricing, reim-

bursement rates, any appropri- 4. Remain optimistic.

ate discount rates, etc. should be Your mediator should be pre-

resolved well in advance of the pared to engage early in the

mediation session. And relevant process. She should ask the

contracts, related documents important questions. Have all

and spreadsheets should be the issues been identified? Will

exchanged in a timely m anner. all necessary parties be present?

Have accurate calculations been

3. Is a prompt payment law completed and exchanged?

in play?

This information will assist the

Texas is one of many states mediator in crafting creative

which has a Prompt Pay Act. solutions.

Work with the other side(s) to share necessary information. Protective orders may be used to address privacy and confidentiality concerns.

Be open to joint sessions, not for the purpose of table pounding and argument, but to collaborate on resolution strategies. The parties are the ones closest to the dispute and play a valuable role in successful settlements.

Finally, remain optimistic. With careful planning, preparation and open dialogue between the parties, you will have set the stage for successful resolution.

Adrienne Publicover, Esq. has counseled domestic insurers and brokers in litigation matters in state and federal courts. Having also practiced in the London market, she has successfully negotiated thousands of life, health and disability claims, ERISA matters, property damage, coverage issues, employment and personal injury claims. She may be reached at [email protected]

Reprinted with permission from the March 24, 2017 edition of the Texas Lawyer 2017 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All rights reserved. Further duplication without permission is prohibited. For information, contact 877-257-3382 or [email protected]. # 651-04-17-02

JAMS - Adrienne Publicover
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • WhatsApp
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • USA
  • Texas
  • Arbitration & ADR
  • Healthcare & Life Sciences
  • JAMS

Laws

  • Affordable Care Act 2010 (USA)

Popular articles from this firm

  1. JAMS International Arbitration Guidelines *
  2. Cynthia H. Cwik, Esq., FCIArb, Joins JAMS in San Diego *
  3. Do Arbitrators Have the Power to Order Third-Party Discovery in California Arbitrations? *
  4. Are Emotional Distress Damages in FEHA Settlements Taxable? *
  5. New York City Joint Remedial Process - On NYPD's Stop, Question, and Frisk and Trespass Enforcement Policies *
Interested in contributing?
Get closer to winning business faster with Lexology's complete suite of dynamic products designed to help you unlock new opportunities with our highly engaged audience of legal professionals looking for answers.
Learn more
Powered by Lexology

Professional development

  • Drafting Skeleton Arguments - Hints & Tips Live At Your Desk - Learn Live

    MBL Seminars | 3 CPD hours
    Online
    7 April 2026
  • A to Z of Construction Law in 2 Days

    MBL Seminars | 10 CPD hours
    London
    14 - 15 April 2026
  • Maths for Smart Lawyers - Live at Your Desk - Learn Live

    MBL Seminars | 1.5 CPD hours
    Online
    28 May 2026
View all

Related practical resources PRO

  • Checklist Checklist: Drafting an agency agreement (USA)
  • Checklist Checklist: Anti-bribery and corruption risk assessment (UK)
  • Checklist Checklist: Responding to a data breach (USA)
View all

Related research hubs

Affordable Care Act 2010 (USA)

USA

Arbitration & ADR

Healthcare & Life Sciences

Resources
  • Daily newsfeed
  • Panoramic
  • Research hubs
  • Learn
  • In-depth
  • Lexy Find
  • Scanner
  • Contracts & clauses
Lexology Index
  • Find an expert
  • Reports
  • Research methodology
  • Submissions
  • FAQ
  • Instruct Counsel
  • Client Choice 2025
More
  • Lexy AI
  • About us
  • Legal Influencers
  • Firms
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Lexology Academic
  • Lexology Talent Management
Legal
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
Contact
  • Help centre
  • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Submissions
 
  • Login
  • Register
  • TwitterFollow on X
  • LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

© Copyright 2006 - 2026 Law Business Research

Law Business Research